Overview

Bayview On The Park

52 Queens Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
+61 392 439 999

C$ 103+

Overall guest ratings

7.2/10 Good
based on 3,315 reviews

Review highlights

  • 9.1
  • 8.2
  • 5.5
  • 4.8

Good to Know

  • Close to public transport

Nearby

    show all

    About

    Bayview On The Park offers an airport shuttle at scheduled times and puts you within a 10-minute drive of Melbourne Cricket Ground and St. Kilda Beach. The outdoor pool is a great spot to take a dip, and guests can grab a bite to eat at Sails Brasserie, which serves local cuisine and is open for breakfast and dinner. A poolside bar and a fitness center are other highlights, and rooms at this upscale hotel offer refrigerators and bathrobes.

    Less More
    Hotels.com

    Amenities

    • Fitness centre
    • Free Wi-Fi
    • Accessible
    • Business centre
    • Currency exchange on-site
    • Laundry service
    • Meeting/Banquet facilities
    • Outdoor pool
    • No smoking
    • Restaurant
    • Bar/Lounge
    • Air-conditioned
    • 24 Hour Front Desk
    • Laundry facilities
    • Free Internet
    • Pets not allowed
    • Parking (surcharge)
    • Storage available
    • Wedding services
    Less More
    Reviews

    Guest reviews

    Overall Rating

    7.2 Good
    based on 3,315 reviews
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
      7.2 "Great parking, according to 72%."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.7 "City centre within easy reach, said 97%."
      9.0 "90% liked the proximity to shopping."
      7.7 "Easily accessible by car, said 77%."
      8.8 "88% enjoyed the restaurants & bars nearby."
      10.0 "100% appreciated the closeness to the beach."
    • 8.2 "Good value."
    • 8.0 "Great service."
      8.0 "80% were happy with the room service."
      9.1 "91% found the restaurant service to be one of the best."
      8.8 "88% said the concierge service was amazing."
    • 7.9 "Good beach."
    • 6.8 "Breakfast is mediocre."
      6.0 "Breakfast prices were ok, according to 60%."
    • 5.5 "Average comfort."
      5.6 "Beds were acceptable for 56%."
      6.9 "Only 69% said rooms were big enough."
    • 4.8 "Rooms are not good."
      2.5 "75% complained about the bathroom."
      0.7 "93% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.2 "For 88%, the rooms looked old."
      2.5 "75% found problems with the furniture."
      1.7 "83% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      2.7 "73% had problems with the shower."
      2.1 "Air conditioning was criticized by 79%."
      2.5 "75% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.0 "80% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 3.4 "Internet is poor."
      2.7 "73% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.2 "Terrible amenities."
      2.9 "71% thought the building wasn't nice."
      1.0 "90% complained about the elevator."
      3.3 "For 67%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      0.8 "92% thought the facilities needed updating."
      0.8 "92% didn't like the architecture."
    • 2.3 "Horrible vibe."
      1.2 "88% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      3.3 "For 67%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      3.6 "64% didn't like the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    7.3 Good
    based on 1,723 reviews
    • 9.2 "Terrific location."
      7.5 "Great parking, according to 75%."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.6 "City centre within easy reach, said 96%."
    • 8.1 "Good value."
    • 8.1 "Bar is amazing."
    • 8.1 "Great service."
      8.9 "89% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.8 "78% were happy with the room service."
    • 7.1 "Good breakfast."
    • 4.9 "Not very clean."
      4.9 "51% thought it was rather dirty."
      2.6 "74% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 4.5 "Rooms are not good."
      0.6 "94% thought they were poorly maintained."
      2.5 "75% complained about the bathroom."
      1.3 "For 87%, the rooms looked old."
      2.3 "77% found problems with the furniture."
      1.4 "86% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      2.2 "Air conditioning was criticized by 78%."
      2.6 "74% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.8 "72% had problems with the shower."
      1.9 "81% criticized the small bathroom."
    • 3.4 "Internet is poor."
      2.7 "73% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 3.0 "Terrible amenities."
      2.8 "72% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.9 "91% complained about the elevator."
      3.6 "For 64%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      0.7 "93% thought the facilities needed updating."
      1.0 "90% didn't like the architecture."
    • 2.5 "Horrible vibe."
      1.3 "87% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      3.6 "For 64%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      3.7 "63% didn't like the unstylish hotel."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    7.3 Good
    based on 596 reviews
    • 9.1 "Terrific location."
      7.3 "Great parking, according to 73%."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.2 "92% liked the proximity to shopping."
      9.5 "City centre within easy reach, said 95%."
    • 8.2 "Good value."
    • 8.0 "Great service."
      9.2 "92% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.5 "75% thought the service was very professional."
      7.9 "79% were happy with the room service."
    • 7.7 "Good pool."
    • 6.7 "Breakfast is mediocre."
      5.7 "Breakfast prices were ok, according to 57%."
    • 5.5 "Average comfort."
      5.4 "Beds were acceptable for 54%."
    • 4.9 "Not very clean."
    • 4.0 "Rooms are not good."
      2.3 "77% complained about the bathroom."
      0.5 "95% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.3 "For 87%, the rooms looked old."
      1.8 "82% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      2.5 "75% had problems with the shower."
      2.2 "78% found problems with the furniture."
    • 2.9 "Terrible amenities."
      2.6 "74% thought the building wasn't nice."
      2.9 "For 71%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
      0.9 "91% thought the facilities needed updating."
      0.7 "93% didn't like the architecture."
      0.9 "91% complained about the elevator."
    • 2.3 "Horrible vibe."
      1.3 "87% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      3.2 "68% didn't like the unstylish hotel."
      2.9 "For 71%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    6.7 Good
    based on 232 reviews
    • 8.7 "Location is great."
      7.3 "Great parking, according to 73%."
    • 8.3 "Good value."
    • 8.0 "Great service."
      9.2 "92% found the staff to be very friendly."
    • 7.1 "Good breakfast."
    • 5.6 "Average comfort."
      7.0 "70% thought rooms were spacious."
      5.6 "Beds were acceptable for 56%."
    • 4.9 "Rooms are not good."
      2.5 "75% complained about the bathroom."
      1.3 "For 87%, the rooms looked old."
      2.4 "76% found problems with the furniture."
      0.6 "94% thought they were poorly maintained."
    • 3.7 "Internet is poor."
    • 3.3 "Bad amenities."
      3.0 "70% thought the building wasn't nice."
      1.2 "88% complained about the elevator."
      2.9 "For 71%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 2.0 "Horrible vibe."
      1.1 "89% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      2.9 "For 71%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    View all review categories

    Overall Rating

    7.2 Good
    based on 762 reviews
    • 8.9 "Location is great."
      10.0 "Near to public transport, according to 100%."
      9.5 "City centre within easy reach, said 95%."
    • 8.3 "Bar is amazing."
    • 8.0 "Great service."
      8.9 "89% found the staff to be very friendly."
      7.7 "77% were happy with the room service."
      7.2 "72% thought the service was very professional."
    • 6.2 "Breakfast is mediocre."
    • 5.5 "Average comfort."
      5.8 "Beds were acceptable for 58%."
      6.9 "Only 69% said rooms were big enough."
    • 4.9 "Not very clean."
      4.4 "56% thought it was rather dirty."
      2.4 "76% said the bathroom was dirty."
    • 4.3 "Rooms are not good."
      2.7 "73% complained about the bathroom."
      0.8 "92% thought they were poorly maintained."
      1.0 "For 90%, the rooms looked old."
      2.5 "75% found problems with the furniture."
      1.6 "84% thought the tv was sub-standard."
      1.9 "Air conditioning was criticized by 81%."
      2.4 "76% said the bathroom was dirty."
      2.4 "76% had problems with the shower."
    • 3.1 "Disappointing internet connection."
      2.5 "75% said the wifi quality was bad."
    • 2.7 "Terrible amenities."
      2.5 "75% thought the building wasn't nice."
      0.7 "93% thought the facilities needed updating."
      1.0 "90% complained about the elevator."
      0.7 "93% didn't like the architecture."
      3.4 "For 66%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    • 2.0 "Horrible vibe."
      0.9 "91% criticized the unstylish hotel."
      3.1 "69% didn't like the unstylish hotel."
      3.4 "For 66%, the lobby entrance was sub-standard."
    View all review categories
    Hotel type
    Solo Hotel
    Guests recommend this hotel for solo travelers.
    Good to Know
    "Close to public transport"
    data provided by TrustYou

    Recent reviews

    Find reviews that mention:
    city centre
    paying for parking
    door jambs
    easy public transport
    professional efficient
    lake view room
    lake view
    albert
    grand prix
    access to transport
    scramble egg
    More
    More

    Photos
    Map

    Map